Timeline for p-cycles and Fluxes
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2016 at 12:55 | vote | accept | Jordan | ||
| May 30, 2016 at 14:51 | comment | added | Jordan | You are right, thanks for the comment. First of all, yes, by non-trivial flux, I mean what you say. Secondly, you are correct, it is not well put; I mean why the compact manifold has to contain p-cycles in order to support fluxes. The topology has to do with the different choices of curves that one can use. But you are absolutely right, i could have stated it in a more proper way, thanks for the comment. | |
| May 30, 2016 at 14:47 | comment | added | ACuriousMind♦ | This question could use a lot more context. What, exactly, do you mean by "non-trivial flux" (I would take $\int_{C^p} F_{(p)}\neq 0$ as the definition of "non-trivial flux")? What do you mean by "the geometry should be a p-cycle"? The geometry of what? Why are you talking about topology after that? | |
| May 30, 2016 at 14:40 | answer | added | Lawrence B. Crowell | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 30, 2016 at 14:16 | history | asked | Jordan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |