Timeline for What is relationship between electromagnetic mass and rest mass?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2023 at 15:20 | answer | added | Sergio Prats | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 29, 2016 at 15:00 | vote | accept | Anubhav Goel | ||
| May 28, 2016 at 17:08 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/736605040849358848 | ||
| May 26, 2016 at 14:35 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | Possible duplicate: physics.stackexchange.com/q/80856/2451 | |
| May 26, 2016 at 14:33 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| May 26, 2016 at 14:11 | answer | added | czechmea | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 23, 2016 at 15:48 | comment | added | Anubhav Goel | @PeterR They solved using relativity by increasing $E_{em}$ , I think. So, actual question is as it is. | |
| May 23, 2016 at 15:38 | comment | added | Peter R | The Wikipedia article cited above also states that the mass is resolved when the Relativistic effects are taken into consideration, The 4/3 issue is not new. it goes back to over 100 year and the discrepency was resolved as explained in the above citings. Sometimes, text books incorrectly incude the 4/3 term. | |
| May 23, 2016 at 15:02 | comment | added | Anubhav Goel | @PeterR Do I have to read it all? 😠It will then take me some days to progress further. Your paper is of 1962 and my citation in question above is of 2011😉 | |
| May 23, 2016 at 14:10 | comment | added | Peter R | When you apply Special Relativity, the 4/3 term vanishes. This paper from 1962 explains it. philsoc.org/1962Spring/1526transcript.html | |
| May 23, 2016 at 12:31 | history | edited | Anubhav Goel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 93 characters in body
|
| May 23, 2016 at 0:30 | history | edited | Anubhav Goel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 659 characters in body
|
| May 22, 2016 at 15:51 | history | edited | Anubhav Goel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 34 characters in body
|
| May 22, 2016 at 15:20 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body; edited tags
|
| May 22, 2016 at 14:32 | comment | added | Anubhav Goel | in the framework of the relativistic Standard Model is currently used. In addition, some problems concerning the electromagnetic mass and self-energy of charged particles are still studied. | |
| May 22, 2016 at 14:31 | comment | added | Anubhav Goel | @Omry Electromagnetic mass was initially a concept of classical mechanics, denoting as to how much the electromagnetic field, or the self-energy, is contributing to the mass of charged particles. It was first derived by J. J. Thomson in 1881 and was for some time also considered as a dynamical explanation of inertial mass per se. Today, the relation of mass, momentum,velocity and all forms of energy, including electromagnetic energy, is analyzed on the basis of Albert Einstein's special relativity and mass–energy equivalence. As to the cause of mass of elementary particles, the Higgs mechanism | |
| May 22, 2016 at 14:26 | history | asked | Anubhav Goel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |