Timeline for Do gases have phonons?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| May 12, 2016 at 5:01 | comment | added | Rococo | Yes, it was fine just as a general illustration of your point. But I was curious whether it was referring to a study where quantum physics was applied or (as it appears) a purely classical study. | |
| May 11, 2016 at 17:30 | comment | added | valerio | pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2008/sm/… it was just to show that $S$ goes to $0$ as a function of time in a non-crystalline material. Any other example would be ok, but maybe I should have specified where it came from. | |
| May 11, 2016 at 17:16 | comment | added | Rococo | Where does your figure come from? | |
| May 11, 2016 at 17:11 | history | edited | valerio | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 186 characters in body
|
| May 11, 2016 at 17:07 | comment | added | valerio | Yes, you're right. Even if I'm not really sure how much you can apply what I said about liquids to gases... | |
| May 11, 2016 at 12:57 | comment | added | Arnold Neumaier | Given the update, shouldn't you remove the initial sentence ''No, they haven't''? | |
| May 10, 2016 at 14:18 | history | edited | valerio | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added new insights
|
| May 9, 2016 at 7:04 | history | answered | valerio | CC BY-SA 3.0 |