Timeline for Pseudo force/negative acceleration
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2016 at 11:28 | comment | added | Vaibhav Singh | The whole system is accelerating downwards, hence we do not frame the answer according to the mass m2 but according to the whole system w.r.t to the ground. | |
| May 4, 2016 at 8:48 | comment | added | xasthor | And why does the pseudo force method lead to an answer that is "biased" towards m2 accelerating upwards relative to the ground? i.e assuming m2 will be accelerating upwards from the ground frame? | |
| May 4, 2016 at 8:47 | comment | added | xasthor | I have HC Verma too :P My main question is: They have presumed m2 to be accelerating downwards w.r.t the ground frame. If it was actually accelerating upwards w,r,t the ground frame, how would this relation work? | |
| May 4, 2016 at 6:36 | history | answered | Vaibhav Singh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |