Timeline for An explanation of Hawking Radiation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2022 at 10:11 | comment | added | Peter Bernhard | "...looks different to different observers..." may relate to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. | |
| Oct 12, 2021 at 3:27 | comment | added | Ebi | @John Rennie The radiation can't be coming from inside the BH (beyond the event horizon) because it is electromagnetic wave that travels at the speed of light. Am I correct? If this is correct, the radiation is coming from outside of the BH event horizon. So, how can it reduce the mass/energy of the BH (and eventually cause BH evaporation)? Could someone explain this please? | |
| Jan 24, 2021 at 2:21 | comment | added | posfan12 | Is the amount of matter/energy expelled equal to the amount matter/energy consumed by the black hole? Does it balance out? | |
| Sep 27, 2020 at 14:34 | comment | added | Rick | From a mathematic standpoint, this makes sense. From a logic standpoint, I am troubled. How does radiation appearing from the vacuum above the event horizon, bleed energy from the singularity? | |
| Sep 13, 2020 at 2:41 | comment | added | alexchandel | This fairly describes the production of radiation (tho you might mention Bogoliubov transformations). But could you explain how this actually reduces the mass of the black hole? Without analogy? | |
| Aug 25, 2016 at 13:29 | vote | accept | Noah P | ||
| Apr 26, 2016 at 17:44 | history | edited | John Rennie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Add footnote
|
| Apr 26, 2016 at 17:25 | history | edited | John Rennie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Add links
|
| Apr 26, 2016 at 17:23 | history | edited | John Rennie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Add links
|
| Apr 26, 2016 at 17:11 | history | edited | ACuriousMind♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Not a scattering amplitude in the technical sense
|
| Apr 26, 2016 at 17:02 | history | answered | John Rennie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |