Timeline for Matter and Antimatter (Hypothetical question) [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
22 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2017 at 4:52 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Mar 8, 2017 at 4:51 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Mar 8, 2017 at 4:52 | |||||
| Apr 30, 2016 at 7:13 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Mar 8, 2017 at 4:51 | |||||
| Apr 21, 2016 at 0:08 | history | closed |
CuriousOne user36790 ACuriousMind♦ Martin Gert |
Duplicate of What is "pure energy" in matter-antimatter annihilation made of? | |
| Apr 17, 2016 at 15:15 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Apr 30, 2016 at 7:13 | |||||
| Apr 17, 2016 at 13:56 | comment | added | user114592 | I din't check the video though! | |
| Apr 17, 2016 at 12:33 | history | protected | Qmechanic♦ | ||
| Apr 17, 2016 at 11:20 | answer | added | anna v | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 17, 2016 at 10:43 | comment | added | anna v | please note that in the video of HariPrasad there is a mistake, it is not only charge that has to be nullified, but all specific quantum numbers hat identify a particle have to be multiplied by -1 to get the antiparticle of the same mass,( like lepton number, strangeness , baryon number ...) | |
| Apr 17, 2016 at 6:47 | answer | added | John Rennie | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 17, 2016 at 6:15 | answer | added | user114592 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 17, 2016 at 6:12 | comment | added | user114592 | @HariPrasad I got my answer :) | |
| Apr 17, 2016 at 5:31 | comment | added | hxri | @AviralKhare Read this question from Quora: If I could manage to fill a glass with anti-hydrogen, and mixed it with an equal amount of water would it produce oxygen? | |
| Apr 17, 2016 at 5:30 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 21, 2016 at 0:08 | |||||
| Apr 17, 2016 at 5:25 | comment | added | hxri | @AviralKhare Watch this Video Minute Physics: Antimatter Explained | |
| Apr 17, 2016 at 5:24 | comment | added | CuriousOne | It is not the elements that are annihilating but the particles in them, i.e. you get electron/positron and quark/antiquark reactions, which will produce mesons and then photons, again: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…. There are more detailed articles for physicists, like "Proton-Antiproton Annihilation and Meson Spectroscopy with the Crystal Barrel∗" by Claude Amsler. You do retain a remaining nucleus or fragments thereof, of course. | |
| Apr 17, 2016 at 5:22 | history | edited | user114592 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 34 characters in body
|
| Apr 17, 2016 at 5:19 | comment | added | user114592 | @CuriousOne i will correct that "pure energy" but my question is not duplicate as i am talking about specific elememts and the link has just matter and antimatter. | |
| Apr 17, 2016 at 5:19 | comment | added | CuriousOne | Possible duplicate of What is "pure energy" in matter-antimatter annihilation made of? | |
| Apr 17, 2016 at 5:16 | comment | added | CuriousOne | There is no such thing as "pure energy". Energy is the ability of a system to perform work. Energy is not "a thing", but it's a property of a system. When you annihilate matter with anti-matter, what comes out are other particles and light, all of which have energy, but they are not energy themselves. See physics.stackexchange.com/questions/39293/… and the duplicates therein. | |
| Apr 17, 2016 at 5:12 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 17, 2016 at 9:53 | |||||
| Apr 17, 2016 at 5:11 | history | asked | user114592 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |