Skip to main content
24 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 25, 2019 at 10:02 vote accept Tom
Jun 23, 2019 at 15:02 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Feb 16, 2019 at 13:02 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Oct 28, 2016 at 18:07 answer added Paul timeline score: 0
May 8, 2016 at 7:03 history tweeted twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/729205086388400128
Apr 15, 2016 at 10:05 answer added Peter Fry timeline score: 1
Apr 13, 2016 at 10:11 history edited Tom CC BY-SA 3.0
New suggestion.
Apr 11, 2016 at 17:55 comment added Tom @Carl: perhaps. But I'm not sure how possible that is with the inexpensive (relatively) components involved. Two concerns: first, how to form a collimated beam at all from that laser source. Secondly, whether the mirrors on the galvo can stand the power density. Actually the second point is a concern anyway and I'm still trying to get information from the supplier on the spec of the mirrors it comes with.
Apr 11, 2016 at 17:42 comment added Carl Witthoft How about you form a small diameter collimated beam instead? Then you don't have to worry about delta focal length.
Apr 11, 2016 at 15:40 answer added Peter Diehr timeline score: 0
Apr 11, 2016 at 15:22 comment added Peter Diehr Let us continue this discussion in chat.
Apr 11, 2016 at 15:22 comment added Peter Diehr You would have to translate this downstream lens in coordination with the galvos; this seems much more difficult than a slight fore-and-aft motion required to keep the path length constant.
Apr 11, 2016 at 14:38 comment added Tom I guess another option is to focus the beam as near infinity as possible (ie as near a collimated beam as possible) and then put a lens downstream of the galvo. Any thoughts?
Apr 11, 2016 at 13:58 comment added Peter Diehr I worked in a lab with a similar project. This was how they did it; the servo program was calculated in advance for the servo and the galvos; then kept in synch.
Apr 11, 2016 at 13:04 comment added Tom Overall I was hoping that it'd be possible to use another lens to make the beam focused across a plane rather than a sphere - as I said in the question, one option is to make the galvo far enough away from the build plane that it approximates a sphere, but that leads to an awkwardly large machine.
Apr 11, 2016 at 13:02 comment added Tom @garyp: Looking to use a laser module such as this: [uk.civillaser.com/… to cure UV-sensitive resin in a top-down SLA 3D printer. The laser module has variable focal length but it's not quickly variable (though I guess it'd be possible to rig up a servo mechanism to the focus adjustment). Obviously the print quality is going to depend on how exactly the beam can be focused on the print surface.
Apr 11, 2016 at 12:58 comment added Tom @PeterDiehr: Not a bad thought, though since the galvo is capable of ~30kpps it'd have to be a very fast servo loop moving a relatively heavy laser module (the lens is built into the laser module).
Apr 11, 2016 at 12:47 comment added Peter Diehr Program a servo to move the lens forward as the beam travels a longer path; you will have to calculate the path length as a function of the angle, and use that for the program.
Apr 11, 2016 at 12:30 comment added garyp Can you tell us more about your application ... especially why the native spot size of the laser is too large. Knowing what you are trying to accomplish will help.
Apr 11, 2016 at 12:16 comment added Tom No. The plane is the bottom of an SLA printer - a flat print surface is more or less a requirement.
Apr 11, 2016 at 11:50 history edited Kyle Oman CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 1 character in body; edited tags
Apr 11, 2016 at 11:40 comment added Farcher Can the plane become curved so that the distance is sensibly constant?
Apr 11, 2016 at 11:40 review First posts
Apr 11, 2016 at 11:49
Apr 11, 2016 at 11:34 history asked Tom CC BY-SA 3.0