Skip to main content
18 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 9, 2016 at 14:24 vote accept phil
Apr 9, 2016 at 14:24 history edited phil CC BY-SA 3.0
better title?
Apr 9, 2016 at 0:23 comment added user10851 Please see our guide on writing good titles.
Apr 8, 2016 at 17:37 review Close votes
Apr 9, 2016 at 6:03
Apr 8, 2016 at 17:19 history edited Qmechanic CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body; edited tags
Apr 8, 2016 at 16:10 comment added phil @PeterR It's the Princeton Review AP Physic C book.
Apr 8, 2016 at 16:03 comment added Peter R I would get a refund on that book
Apr 8, 2016 at 16:02 comment added Tofi The issue is that you are keeping the height constant while the book is keeping the time duration of sliding constant.
Apr 8, 2016 at 16:01 comment added phil @Javier I edited it...^
Apr 8, 2016 at 16:01 comment added phil @TheGhostOfPerdition I edited it to give the solution that the book provides
Apr 8, 2016 at 15:59 history edited phil CC BY-SA 3.0
added 619 characters in body
Apr 8, 2016 at 15:50 comment added Courage @Javier yes, but the OP is confused btw the factors $2$ and $\sqrt 2$, how would these factors change the dimension?
Apr 8, 2016 at 15:48 comment added Javier @TheGhostOfPerdition: The only possible relation between $v$, $g$ and $h$ is $v \propto \sqrt{gh}$.
Apr 8, 2016 at 15:44 comment added Courage @Javier I agree that OP is right, but how can one tell it by using just dimensional analysis?
Apr 8, 2016 at 15:43 answer added John Rennie timeline score: 4
Apr 8, 2016 at 15:38 comment added Javier As far as I can see your analysis is correct. It even follows by dimensional analysis, without doing any math.
Apr 8, 2016 at 15:33 review First posts
Apr 8, 2016 at 15:40
Apr 8, 2016 at 15:31 history asked phil CC BY-SA 3.0