Timeline for Standing waves in 2 dimensions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2016 at 18:36 | history | edited | L. Levrel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 500 characters in body
|
| Apr 6, 2016 at 17:42 | comment | added | L. Levrel | 2+2=4. The second wall reflects both the incident wave and the wave reflected on the first wall. Also, I'll edit my answer because the function you obtained already is a standing wave. | |
| Apr 6, 2016 at 15:53 | comment | added | StarBucK | Thank you ! So if I summarise in 1D we only need one reflexion (so 2 propagative waves in opposite directions) whereas in 2D we need 3 propagative waves (kx,ky,+wt)+(kx,ky,-wt)+(kx,-ky,+wt) | |
| Apr 6, 2016 at 15:51 | vote | accept | StarBucK | ||
| Apr 6, 2016 at 15:41 | history | answered | L. Levrel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |