Skip to main content
17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 22, 2016 at 18:00 comment added Gonenc Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/193684/68030
Mar 22, 2016 at 0:22 history tweeted twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/712072002073403392
Mar 21, 2016 at 22:33 comment added Criticizing Israel not allowed @Joel Well, if radians were considered a dimension, that formula would have a lot of negative powers of radians in it. It would be the same computation, but written in a way that would make the units work.
Mar 21, 2016 at 21:59 history edited rob CC BY-SA 3.0
clean up TeX
Mar 21, 2016 at 21:59 history protected Qmechanic
Mar 21, 2016 at 21:47 answer added rob timeline score: 4
Mar 21, 2016 at 21:45 answer added David Richerby timeline score: 5
Mar 21, 2016 at 21:38 comment added Joel What I'm saying is basically an extension of the accepted answer - radians aren't a dimension. I'm just highlighting one of the things that would really go wrong if people tried to treat them as if they were.
Mar 21, 2016 at 21:28 comment added skrat @Joel yes, that makes sense, but the question is as follows (is written somewhere here in the comments but wasn't answered). If my $k$ is defined as $k=EI/L$ where $E$ is Young's elasticity module and $I$is moment of inertia and $L$ is unit length in meters, than $k$ is in units of Nm. Now the question is: does one have to divide the previously defined $k$ by $2\pi$ in order to get the correct units (Nm/rad) or not? I do understand the meaning of radians, at least I think I do, but sometimes the numbers matter too! Or do i simply imagine that the radians are already there since rad =1.
Mar 21, 2016 at 21:23 comment added Joel Interesting fact - you'd never be able to take sin or cos of a number in radians if radians were an actual "dimension" - consider adding up the Taylor Series terms. Lots of different powers of that dimension.
Mar 21, 2016 at 20:30 answer added Massimo Ortolano timeline score: 4
Mar 21, 2016 at 13:57 vote accept skrat
Mar 21, 2016 at 12:11 vote accept skrat
Mar 21, 2016 at 13:57
Mar 21, 2016 at 12:02 comment added Qmechanic Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/37881/2451 , physics.stackexchange.com/q/36079/2451 and links therein.
Mar 21, 2016 at 11:50 answer added lemon timeline score: 10
Mar 21, 2016 at 11:19 answer added jm22b timeline score: 29
Mar 21, 2016 at 11:15 history asked skrat CC BY-SA 3.0