Skip to main content
Post Closed as "Not suitable for this site" by CuriousOne, ACuriousMind, user10851, Bill N, Martin
improved formatting
Source Link
user36790
user36790
  • Its not that I question the conclusions reached concerning the Michelson–Morley experiment, however I would like to know how the following issue was addressed please?

If I could pass bob through a beam splitersplitter, and have each copy of him pace out each leg of the interferometer at say $2km/hr$$2~\rm{km/hr}$. However if along one of the legs, there was an escalator aiding his initial progress at $1km/hr$$1~\rm{km/hr}$.

OkOkay, so they each leave the beam splitter at the same time, however aided by the escalator one of them moves at $3km/hr$$3~\rm{km/hr}$, and reaches the mirror at the end of his leg earlier than the other. But on the return journey he is inhibited by progression of the escalator, and moves at $1km/hr$$1~\rm{km/hr}$. So the other bob who traveledtravelled at $2km/hr$$2~\rm{km/hr}$ the whole time, makes up ground on the other bob on the return journey, and they arrive home at the same time as each other.

  • With so many clever people working on this experiment over the years, I know there must be a contingency for this issue. If somebody can inform me please?

It will be immensely helpful for me

  • Its not that I question the conclusions reached concerning the Michelson–Morley experiment, however I would like to know how the following issue was addressed please?

If I could pass bob through a beam spliter, and have each copy of him pace out each leg of the interferometer at say $2km/hr$. However if along one of the legs, there was an escalator aiding his initial progress at $1km/hr$.

Ok, so they each leave the beam splitter at the same time, however aided by the escalator one of them moves at $3km/hr$, and reaches the mirror at the end of his leg earlier than the other. But on the return journey he is inhibited by progression of the escalator, and moves at $1km/hr$. So the other bob who traveled at $2km/hr$ the whole time, makes up ground on the other bob on the return journey, and they arrive home at the same time as each other.

  • With so many clever people working on this experiment over the years, I know there must be a contingency for this issue. If somebody can inform me please?

It will be immensely helpful for me

  • Its not that I question the conclusions reached concerning the Michelson–Morley experiment, however I would like to know how the following issue was addressed please?

If I could pass bob through a beam splitter, and have each copy of him pace out each leg of the interferometer at say $2~\rm{km/hr}$. However if along one of the legs, there was an escalator aiding his initial progress at $1~\rm{km/hr}$.

Okay, so they each leave the beam splitter at the same time, however aided by the escalator one of them moves at $3~\rm{km/hr}$, and reaches the mirror at the end of his leg earlier than the other. But on the return journey he is inhibited by progression of the escalator, and moves at $1~\rm{km/hr}$. So the other bob who travelled at $2~\rm{km/hr}$ the whole time, makes up ground on the other bob on the return journey, and they arrive home at the same time as each other.

  • With so many clever people working on this experiment over the years, I know there must be a contingency for this issue. If somebody can inform me please?

Its not that I question the conclusions reached concerning the Michelson–Morley experiment, however I would like to know how the following issue was addressed please?

  • Its not that I question the conclusions reached concerning the Michelson–Morley experiment, however I would like to know how the following issue was addressed please?

If I could pass bob through a beam spliter, and have each copy of him pace out each leg of the interferometer at say 2km/hr$2km/hr$. However if along one of the legs, there was an escalator aiding his initial progress at 1km/hr$1km/hr$.

Ok, so they each leave the beam splitter at the same time, however aided by the escalator one of them moves at 3km/hr$3km/hr$, and reaches the mirror at the end of his leg earlier than the other. But on the return journey he is inhibited by progression of the escalator, and moves at 1km/hr$1km/hr$. So the other bob who traveled at 2km/hr$2km/hr$ the whole time, makes up ground on the other bob on the return journey, and they arrive home at the same time as each other.

  • With so many clever people working on this experiment over the years, I know there must be a contingency for this issue. If somebody can inform me please?

With so many clever people working on this experiment over the years, I know there must be a contingency for this issue. If somebody can inform me please? It will be immenslyimmensely helpful for me

Its not that I question the conclusions reached concerning the Michelson–Morley experiment, however I would like to know how the following issue was addressed please?

If I could pass bob through a beam spliter, and have each copy of him pace out each leg of the interferometer at say 2km/hr. However if along one of the legs, there was an escalator aiding his initial progress at 1km/hr.

Ok, so they each leave the beam splitter at the same time, however aided by the escalator one of them moves at 3km/hr, and reaches the mirror at the end of his leg earlier than the other. But on the return journey he is inhibited by progression of the escalator, and moves at 1km/hr. So the other bob who traveled at 2km/hr the whole time, makes up ground on the other bob on the return journey, and they arrive home at the same time as each other.

With so many clever people working on this experiment over the years, I know there must be a contingency for this issue. If somebody can inform me please? It will be immensly helpful for me

  • Its not that I question the conclusions reached concerning the Michelson–Morley experiment, however I would like to know how the following issue was addressed please?

If I could pass bob through a beam spliter, and have each copy of him pace out each leg of the interferometer at say $2km/hr$. However if along one of the legs, there was an escalator aiding his initial progress at $1km/hr$.

Ok, so they each leave the beam splitter at the same time, however aided by the escalator one of them moves at $3km/hr$, and reaches the mirror at the end of his leg earlier than the other. But on the return journey he is inhibited by progression of the escalator, and moves at $1km/hr$. So the other bob who traveled at $2km/hr$ the whole time, makes up ground on the other bob on the return journey, and they arrive home at the same time as each other.

  • With so many clever people working on this experiment over the years, I know there must be a contingency for this issue. If somebody can inform me please?

It will be immensely helpful for me

Source Link
Steve
  • 521
  • 4
  • 13

Michelson Morley experiment?

Its not that I question the conclusions reached concerning the Michelson–Morley experiment, however I would like to know how the following issue was addressed please?

If I could pass bob through a beam spliter, and have each copy of him pace out each leg of the interferometer at say 2km/hr. However if along one of the legs, there was an escalator aiding his initial progress at 1km/hr.

Ok, so they each leave the beam splitter at the same time, however aided by the escalator one of them moves at 3km/hr, and reaches the mirror at the end of his leg earlier than the other. But on the return journey he is inhibited by progression of the escalator, and moves at 1km/hr. So the other bob who traveled at 2km/hr the whole time, makes up ground on the other bob on the return journey, and they arrive home at the same time as each other.

With so many clever people working on this experiment over the years, I know there must be a contingency for this issue. If somebody can inform me please? It will be immensly helpful for me