Timeline for How do integral representations of $\mathbf A$ and $\Phi$ satisfy Lorenz condition?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 2016 at 17:29 | vote | accept | user215721 | ||
| Feb 28, 2016 at 16:21 | answer | added | Michael Seifert | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 28, 2016 at 14:14 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited tags
|
| Feb 28, 2016 at 14:04 | comment | added | user215721 | Oops, that was a typo. corrected. Can you show how? | |
| Feb 28, 2016 at 14:03 | history | edited | user215721 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
| Feb 28, 2016 at 10:58 | comment | added | Urgje | It seems your expression for the scalar potential is incorrect. On the left you have a scalar and on the right a vector. Shouldn't you replace the current density by the charge density. Then the gauge condition would be satisfied. | |
| Feb 28, 2016 at 0:13 | history | edited | user215721 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Feb 28, 2016 at 0:02 | history | edited | user215721 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
| Feb 27, 2016 at 23:57 | history | asked | user215721 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |