Timeline for Could the randomness of quantum mechanics be the result of unseen factors? [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 19, 2016 at 17:56 | vote | accept | J.Todd | ||
Feb 24, 2016 at 20:28 | history | closed |
ACuriousMind♦ John Duffield Sebastian Riese user36790 Qmechanic♦ quantum-mechanics Users with the quantum-mechanics badge or a synonym can single-handedly close quantum-mechanics questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed. |
Duplicate of Is the universe fundamentally deterministic? | |
Feb 24, 2016 at 20:27 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
Feb 24, 2016 at 20:24 | comment | added | J... | @OscarCunningham I don't think Peter's answer says that at all. All he said is that there is no classical "hidden variable" theory that can replace the effectiveness of QM. That doesn't mean that there isn't a deeper thing going on that we don't understand. We know QM isn't complete so it stands to reason that something else could at some point provide a more complete explanation. | |
Feb 24, 2016 at 20:17 | comment | added | Oscar Cunningham | @J... I meant "The answer isn't yes" | |
Feb 24, 2016 at 19:33 | comment | added | J... | @OscarCunningham Didn't I say that? | |
Feb 24, 2016 at 18:50 | comment | added | Oscar Cunningham | @J... But the answer isn't no, as Peter Diehr's answer shows. | |
Feb 24, 2016 at 17:47 | history | edited | J.Todd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Feb 24, 2016 at 17:43 | comment | added | kasperd | This video about entanglement improved my understanding of the subject. | |
Feb 24, 2016 at 17:18 | comment | added | J... | This question can essentially be paraphrased as "Could things we don't understand be explained by things we don't know that we don't know". Naturally, the answer is yes. | |
Feb 24, 2016 at 12:30 | review | Close votes | |||
Feb 24, 2016 at 20:35 | |||||
Feb 24, 2016 at 12:10 | comment | added | ACuriousMind♦ | Possible duplicate of Is the universe fundamentally deterministic? | |
Feb 24, 2016 at 11:09 | comment | added | Peter Diehr | An astute observation! | |
Feb 24, 2016 at 10:42 | comment | added | Oscar Cunningham | It funny that one of the answers to this question says that the hypothesis isn't falsifiable and the other falsifies it. | |
Feb 24, 2016 at 3:34 | answer | added | Peter Diehr | timeline score: 27 | |
Feb 24, 2016 at 3:26 | answer | added | user1717828 | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 24, 2016 at 3:16 | history | edited | J.Todd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 31 characters in body
|
Feb 24, 2016 at 2:49 | history | asked | J.Todd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |