Skip to main content
25 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 20, 2016 at 22:57 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Apr 13, 2016 at 15:09 vote accept Wolpertinger
Oct 20, 2016 at 18:25
Apr 13, 2016 at 15:09 answer added Wolpertinger timeline score: 1
Apr 13, 2016 at 11:48 comment added Wolpertinger @DavidZ ok thank you i'll do that when i get home.
Apr 13, 2016 at 9:54 comment added David Z @Numrok ah, I see what you're coming from, but that's not the intent of duplicate closure. When one question is closed as a duplicate of another, the idea is that any answer which addresses the first question would also be considered a valid answer to the other one. It's not enough that there happens to exist an answer to the other question which addresses the one you're closing. If you've found an answer to your question, I suggest going with Martin's advice.
Apr 13, 2016 at 9:26 history reopened AccidentalFourierTransform
Kyle Oman
John Duffield
Brandon Enright
Martin
Apr 13, 2016 at 9:26 comment added Martin @Numrok: You might also consider writing up your own answer for the benefit of all. Point out where you think you asked the wrong question and how to correct it and then answer it.
Apr 11, 2016 at 16:39 review Reopen votes
Apr 13, 2016 at 9:26
Apr 10, 2016 at 20:33 comment added Wolpertinger @ACuriousMind it always seems to say "this question already has an answer here:" when a duplicate is marked, so I assumed the feature could be used to indicate when a question is answered somewhere else even though the question is not the same. Sorry if that was wrong, should I take any action to reverse the process? This is actually a special case as well because I was simply not informed well enough to ask the correct question that gets to the core of the problem of what I meant, but the other question did.
Apr 10, 2016 at 20:31 history closed Wolpertinger
AccidentalFourierTransform
CommunityBot
Duplicate of Does measurement, quantum in particular, always increase the total entropy?
Apr 10, 2016 at 20:22 comment added ACuriousMind Even if the papers there answer your question, I don't see how this is in any sense a duplicate of the other question.
Apr 10, 2016 at 18:01 review Close votes
Apr 10, 2016 at 20:32
Apr 10, 2016 at 17:46 comment added Wolpertinger The linked papers in the following post answer my question: physics.stackexchange.com/q/22745
Mar 6, 2016 at 20:34 history edited Wolpertinger CC BY-SA 3.0
added 6 characters to body to clarify how the actual question arises in the clarification
Mar 1, 2016 at 7:54 history tweeted twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/704575466565402624
Feb 25, 2016 at 12:39 comment added XXDD For me, the main artifact of regard the measurement problem as the dynamics of dissipative systems is that: To finally reach an eigen state of the measurement basis, it should need time (not matter how fast it might be). Then this seems to conflict with the EPR test. If it takes time for a local measurement resulting in the 'collapsed state', how the remote system can change instantly? Unless that non-local measurement/preparation results in improper mixture instead of proper mixtures.
Feb 24, 2016 at 9:36 history reopened Wolpertinger
user10851
user36790
John Rennie
David Z
S Feb 24, 2016 at 9:36 history mod moved comments to chat
S Feb 24, 2016 at 9:36 comment added David Z Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
Feb 23, 2016 at 0:48 review Reopen votes
Feb 23, 2016 at 6:57
Feb 23, 2016 at 0:36 history edited Wolpertinger CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 6 characters in body
Feb 23, 2016 at 0:33 history edited Wolpertinger CC BY-SA 3.0
added 482 characters in body
Feb 22, 2016 at 23:24 history closed DanielSank
Kyle Kanos
CuriousOne
Mark Mitchison
Norbert Schuch
Opinion-based
Feb 22, 2016 at 22:34 review Close votes
Feb 22, 2016 at 23:24
Feb 22, 2016 at 22:13 history asked Wolpertinger CC BY-SA 3.0