Timeline for Thinking about the properties of 'nothing'
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2020 at 16:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 6, 2016 at 10:17 | comment | added | Constantine Black | ...Heidegger here provides us with a different framework to work and a different way of thinking about such fundamental concepts... So, it might not be physics in it's formulation or methodology, but it is something that under certain criteria (this is a long discussion) can help us expand our thinking. Hope I didn't tired you. Good day. | |
| Mar 6, 2016 at 10:14 | comment | added | Constantine Black | : Hello. About Heidegger and spatiality: Have a look at plato.stanford.edu/entries/heidegger/#CriCar and plato.stanford.edu/entries/heidegger/#Spa . I'm having a problem finding the references I had noted. Anyway, also look if you want at ndpr.nd.edu/news/… . Note that this is not physics, but we need to strictly define the limits of our thought between different disciplines... | |
| Feb 21, 2016 at 13:25 | comment | added | Mozibur Ullah | Let us continue this discussion in chat. | |
| Feb 21, 2016 at 13:25 | comment | added | Mozibur Ullah | @black: well, it's a complex topic; in the wider sense of naturphilosophie, for sure; in the narrow sense of modern physics, as it's done, for itself, I'm not so sure. | |
| Feb 21, 2016 at 13:22 | comment | added | Constantine Black | ...Finally I believe that philosophically our central physical theories(Electrodynamics-classical fields, GR,SR,QM,QFT), provide a framework for some serious ontological( not ontic :) ) questioning. Sorry if I tired you and thank you. Note: Do you know this man: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christos_Yannaras . I believe his work is interesting on subjects like that. | |
| Feb 21, 2016 at 13:20 | comment | added | Constantine Black | Not only(about the title); I don' t think a title is enough. But the whole ontological thought of this work, I think has, from some points of view, some value for a philosophical consideration of physics. I think that phenomenology( even if Heidegger isn't a clear phenomenologist) has some things to provide us about; the study of phenomena( what comes in 'light', their logos) is absolutely related with notions like "presence" or "absence"... | |
| Feb 21, 2016 at 13:15 | comment | added | Mozibur Ullah | Neither of them discuss A's physics in the terms that he put them in, by the way; they have their own philosophical project. | |
| Feb 21, 2016 at 13:09 | comment | added | Mozibur Ullah | @black:You might want to ask those questions on Phil.SE; they're more suitable there ;). | |
| Feb 21, 2016 at 13:07 | comment | added | Mozibur Ullah | ... are you suggesting this because he wrote a book, Being and Nothingness? | |
| Feb 21, 2016 at 13:03 | comment | added | Mozibur Ullah | @black: well, here's one quote for you, Heidegger said (expressing a sentiment about Ancient Greek philosophy) that "philosophy started in greatness, continued in greatness, and ended in greatness"; that's a quote in his discussion of Metaphysics, and probably not quite what you were looking for; I'm not particularly interested in Sartre, unfortunately. | |
| Feb 21, 2016 at 12:53 | comment | added | Constantine Black | Hello. I 'm finding very interesting quoting Aristotle here, in Physics Stack Exchange. If I may propose two thinks, or may I ask them as questions: 1)Can there be a comparison between the word of Aristotle with the findings of current Physics, 2) could you make some references on the subject by more recent philosophers(Heidegger, Sartre, last century) and how they stand in comparison with Physics? Thank you. | |
| Feb 21, 2016 at 12:38 | history | answered | Mozibur Ullah | CC BY-SA 3.0 |