Return to Question

If a certain identifiable part of space that has no type of energy fields manifesting 'in it' for a given duration ; is such a totally empty space the same as 'nothing'? Anything with any property that introduces a lack of symmetry into its states of being is not nothing as 'nothing' could be said to be perfectly symmetric. A space with no energy fields within it is still a 'space' that can have a coordinated system of measurements regarding anything that could travel through the space , so it is not perfectly symmetric regarding its properties and not nothing. Is this argument correct?

If a certain identifiable part of space that has no type of measurable energy fields manifesting 'in it' for a given duration ; is such a totally empty space the same as 'nothing'? Anything with any property that introduces comparable measurements into its physical states is not nothing as 'nothing' could be said to be perfectly incapabable of being measured. A space with no energy fields within it still can have a coordinated system of measurements regarding anything that could travel through the space , so it is not the 'same' as nothing. Is this argument correct?

Is a certain identifiable part of space that has no type of energy fields manifesting 'in it' for a given duration ; is such a totally empty space the same as 'nothing'? Nothing could be said to be perfectly symmetrical in that anything with any property that introduces a lack of symmetry into its states of being is not nothing. So 'nothing' is perfectly symmetrical. A space with no energy fields within it is still a 'space' that can have a coordinated system of measurements regarding anything that could travel through the space. So it is not perfectly symmetric and not nothing. Does this argument have any merit?

If a certain identifiable part of space that has no type of energy fields manifesting 'in it' for a given duration ; is such a totally empty space the same as 'nothing'? Anything with any property that introduces a lack of symmetry into its states of being is not nothing as 'nothing' could be said to be perfectly symmetric. A space with no energy fields within it is still a 'space' that can have a coordinated system of measurements regarding anything that could travel through the space , so it is not perfectly symmetric regarding its properties and not nothing. Is this argument correct?