Timeline for Somewhat unusual projectile motion question [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2020 at 9:39 | history | closed |
John Rennie Charles Francis user258881 Jon Custer stafusa |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Aug 8, 2020 at 17:21 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 11, 2020 at 9:39 | |||||
| Jun 11, 2020 at 9:33 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Aug 4, 2019 at 14:10 | answer | added | Cesareo | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 27, 2018 at 5:07 | comment | added | David White | The stone will be at a fixed distance from the first wall, which is point 1 on its parabolic path. Point 2 corresponds to the lower height and point 3 corresponds to the higher height. This defines 3 points on a parabola. A parabolic equation has 3 constants in it, and any given 3 points uniquely define a given parabola. Thus, there is only ONE velocity which will solve the problem ... there is no "minimum" velocity. There may be a possible problem in translation in going from Russian to English. | |
| Jul 26, 2018 at 22:10 | answer | added | sammy gerbil | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 26, 2018 at 21:40 | history | edited | sammy gerbil | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Feb 21, 2018 at 17:04 | answer | added | Hypergeometricx | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 16, 2016 at 14:06 | vote | accept | R P | ||
| Feb 16, 2016 at 7:25 | answer | added | biryani | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 16, 2016 at 7:17 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 18, 2016 at 18:22 | |||||
| Feb 16, 2016 at 6:19 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| S Feb 16, 2016 at 6:18 | history | suggested | biryani | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Latex formatting
|
| Feb 16, 2016 at 6:13 | answer | added | Ross Millikan | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 16, 2016 at 5:56 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 16, 2016 at 6:18 | |||||
| Feb 16, 2016 at 5:10 | history | asked | R P | CC BY-SA 3.0 |