Timeline for Geometric derivation of quantum mechanics from Lagrangian mechanics
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2016 at 22:32 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | The first subquestion Why action principle? is a duplicate of physics.stackexchange.com/q/9/2451 , physics.stackexchange.com/q/15899/2451 and links therein. | |
| Feb 14, 2016 at 22:31 | history | notice added | Qmechanic♦ | Book Recommendation | |
| Feb 14, 2016 at 22:30 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 22 characters in body; edited tags; Post Made Community Wiki
|
| Feb 14, 2016 at 21:51 | answer | added | Peter Diehr | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 14, 2016 at 20:57 | comment | added | ACuriousMind♦ | The proper setting for a geometric theory of quantum mechanics is the Hamiltonian, not the Lagrangian geometry. There you can do geometric quantization, but really, you don't learn what most physicists do in quantum mechanics from this formal approach. | |
| Feb 14, 2016 at 20:53 | history | asked | user2617 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |