Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2018 at 15:41 history edited Qmechanic
edited tags
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:39 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
Feb 24, 2016 at 20:23 vote accept Samuel
Feb 14, 2016 at 17:37 answer added Will Vousden timeline score: 5
Feb 14, 2016 at 2:20 comment added robert bristow-johnson the other thing about using TDOA for localization is that the wavespeed must be known. i think that they are assuming that Alfred Einstead is also correct that the wavespeed is the same $c$ as for EM. but shouldn't that also be experimentally confirmed? so we have confirmed the existence of gravity waves as well as the existence of super massive black holes in binary pairs that collide with tremendous output (i would hate to be within a lightyear of that event), but we haven't yet confirmed the speed of gravity waves.
Feb 14, 2016 at 1:56 answer added Ernie timeline score: 3
Feb 13, 2016 at 21:11 history edited Qmechanic
edited tags
Feb 13, 2016 at 20:56 comment added Roger Barretto Ok, now we can see the wave signature of celestial bodyes. What makes me a little bumped is the fact that the gravity definitely is not a particle, because if it was, the blackholes would diggest its own gravity and in an ultimate form they wouldnt be the ´source´ of gravity (as emitters of its waves)
Feb 13, 2016 at 19:57 comment added Samuel @AccidentalFT Yeah, they're clearly using TDOA, but with only two detectors. I'm wondering about precision when they have three (or more).
Feb 13, 2016 at 19:53 comment added AccidentalFourierTransform related: How did LIGO detect the source location of the black holes mentioned to be the cause of today's announcement?
Feb 13, 2016 at 19:52 history asked Samuel CC BY-SA 3.0