Timeline for Where Potential increase gets its energy from?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2018 at 4:11 | comment | added | Bill N | When you say potential do you actually mean potential energy? In dealing with charged particles, it's important to realize there is a distinction between the two. Also, potential energy belongs to a system, not to individual particles. | |
| S Jan 1, 2018 at 23:35 | history | suggested | Don Branson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fix minor grammar
|
| Jan 1, 2018 at 22:06 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 1, 2018 at 23:35 | |||||
| Feb 5, 2016 at 16:32 | history | protected | Qmechanic♦ | ||
| Feb 5, 2016 at 16:27 | answer | added | Anubhav Goel | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 5, 2016 at 14:15 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 5, 2016 at 14:15 | answer | added | Farcher | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 5, 2016 at 14:09 | answer | added | garyp | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 5, 2016 at 14:04 | comment | added | honeste_vivere | There is no increase in the net energy of the two particles. Some of B's initial KE is converted into KE for A. By the way, you cannot start with two charged particles at rest in isolation without some external forces at play to begin with because the electric field from each acts over all distances (given enough time). | |
| Feb 5, 2016 at 14:01 | history | edited | Tony Marshle | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 424 characters in body
|
| Feb 5, 2016 at 13:56 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 5, 2016 at 14:04 | |||||
| Feb 5, 2016 at 13:54 | history | asked | Tony Marshle | CC BY-SA 3.0 |