Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 20, 2016 at 21:10 answer added ProfRob timeline score: 2
Jul 20, 2016 at 18:33 answer added Joshua timeline score: 4
Feb 3, 2016 at 0:09 history tweeted twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/694673942569734145
Jan 31, 2016 at 2:09 comment added Lewis Miller Some of these probably do exist in nature, but in unusual places like the crusts of neutron stars. See physics.stackexchange.com/questions/231981/…
Jan 30, 2016 at 6:02 comment added CuriousOne @igael: For heavy elements? I doubt it. I don't think optical detection would work, to begin with. It's not sensitive enough if there is background. I would do mass spectroscopy and use a simple, high throughput mass filter to get rid of everything below let's say uranium, then maybe another filter for the heavier nuclei and then a trap for the target nuclei. If we capture something unexpected, we want to keep it for further analysis. And while all of this sounds cheap, I don't think it would be. We are talking about something like a small isotope separation facility.
Jan 30, 2016 at 4:31 comment added user46925 @CuriousOne : is all the spectrum of a new element predictable from the equations ?
Jan 30, 2016 at 2:25 comment added Gert If they really are that stable, that won't help their detection either. An Israeli scientist claimed a few years back to have detected one in uranium. Turned out to be a dud, though.
Jan 30, 2016 at 1:49 comment added CuriousOne We couldn't rule it out completely, but we can set limits in their abundance in Earth's crust or matter from the solar system by accelerator mass spectroscopy techniques. I can't tell you where the current limits of such ultra-trace analysis techniques are. There is, as far as I can tell, no irreducible background that can't be overcome, so it's probably just a matter of money for the right experiment.
Jan 30, 2016 at 1:13 review First posts
Jan 30, 2016 at 2:51
Jan 30, 2016 at 1:09 history asked nordmarj CC BY-SA 3.0