Timeline for Conceptual doubt regarding nuclear energy levels
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Dec 21, 2017 at 22:35 | history | suggested | andselisk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Improved isotopic notations and units, chemical element names are not capitalized
|
| Dec 21, 2017 at 22:01 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 21, 2017 at 22:35 | |||||
| S Jan 15, 2016 at 11:59 | history | suggested | Buzz♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected isotopes
|
| Jan 15, 2016 at 11:51 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 15, 2016 at 11:59 | |||||
| Jan 15, 2016 at 11:48 | comment | added | anna v | ionisatiion energy has nothing to do with nuclear levels, it is electron levels and orders of magnitude smaller than the mev energies of nuclear transitions. As in the answer it is simpler to work with energy differences. The rest energy of a nucleus is its mass ; in this link you may get an understaning of how it works en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_binding_energy | |
| Jan 15, 2016 at 11:28 | answer | added | John Rennie | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 15, 2016 at 11:11 | history | asked | Student | CC BY-SA 3.0 |