2 explain bad terminology
source | link

In the following, I have replaced "photon" going through slits with "electron", and the measuring device with a "photon". This is the traditional Heisenberg setup.

The interaction of the photon and the electron entangles the photon and the electron, so that the electron cannot make the interference pattern. It has nothing to do with looking at the screen. The looking at the screen only serves to let you know what the result of the observation was.

The entanglement of measuring devices and particles is what causes collapse relative to a detector state, independent of interpretation. The only question is when the collapse turns into a definite outcome, so that the detector state becomes a definite thing, as opposed to an indefinite superposition.

The interaction of the photon and the electron entangles the photon and the electron, so that the electron cannot make the interference pattern. It has nothing to do with looking at the screen. The looking at the screen only serves to let you know what the result of the observation was.

The entanglement of measuring devices and particles is what causes collapse relative to a detector state, independent of interpretation. The only question is when the collapse turns into a definite outcome, so that the detector state becomes a definite thing, as opposed to an indefinite superposition.

In the following, I have replaced "photon" going through slits with "electron", and the measuring device with a "photon". This is the traditional Heisenberg setup.

The interaction of the photon and the electron entangles the photon and the electron, so that the electron cannot make the interference pattern. It has nothing to do with looking at the screen. The looking at the screen only serves to let you know what the result of the observation was.

The entanglement of measuring devices and particles is what causes collapse relative to a detector state, independent of interpretation. The only question is when the collapse turns into a definite outcome, so that the detector state becomes a definite thing, as opposed to an indefinite superposition.

1
source | link

The interaction of the photon and the electron entangles the photon and the electron, so that the electron cannot make the interference pattern. It has nothing to do with looking at the screen. The looking at the screen only serves to let you know what the result of the observation was.

The entanglement of measuring devices and particles is what causes collapse relative to a detector state, independent of interpretation. The only question is when the collapse turns into a definite outcome, so that the detector state becomes a definite thing, as opposed to an indefinite superposition.