Skip to main content
Post Reopened by HDE 226868, John Rennie, Steeven, Ryan Unger, ACuriousMind
deleted 7 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k

If I was in a spaceship continually accelerating at 9.81m/s squared (1g)$9.81m/s^2 =1g$ in a straight line, I would reach near light speed within a year.

On earthEarth, we are in a gravitational field of 1g$1g$, which according to the equivalence principle means we are effectively accelerating at 9.81m/s squared$9.81m/s^2$.

What does this mean? How can we be accelerating without increasing our velocity? Is there some way of looking at this, from some other inertial frame, that means we are travelling near light speed?

If I was in a spaceship continually accelerating at 9.81m/s squared (1g) in a straight line, I would reach near light speed within a year.

On earth, we are in a gravitational field of 1g, which according to the equivalence principle means we are effectively accelerating at 9.81m/s squared.

What does this mean? How can we be accelerating without increasing our velocity? Is there some way of looking at this, from some other inertial frame, that means we are travelling near light speed?

If I was in a spaceship continually accelerating at $9.81m/s^2 =1g$ in a straight line, I would reach near light speed within a year.

On Earth, we are in a gravitational field of $1g$, which according to the equivalence principle means we are effectively accelerating at $9.81m/s^2$.

What does this mean? How can we be accelerating without increasing our velocity? Is there some way of looking at this, from some other inertial frame, that means we are travelling near light speed?

added 2 characters in body
Source Link
Amphibio
  • 1.1k
  • 6
  • 17

If I was in a spaceship continually accelerating at 9.81m/s squared (1g) in a straight line, I would reach near light speed within a year.

On earth, we are in a gravitational field of 1g, which according to the equivalence principle means we are effectively accelerating at 9.81m/s squared.

What does this mean? How can we be accelerating without increasing our velocity? Is there some way of looking at this, from some other inertial frame, that means we are travelling atnear light speed?

If I was in a spaceship continually accelerating at 9.81m/s squared (1g) in a straight line, I would reach near light speed within a year.

On earth, we are in a gravitational field of 1g, which according to the equivalence principle means we are effectively accelerating at 9.81m/s squared.

What does this mean? How can we be accelerating without increasing our velocity? Is there some way of looking at this, from some other inertial frame, that means we are travelling at light speed?

If I was in a spaceship continually accelerating at 9.81m/s squared (1g) in a straight line, I would reach near light speed within a year.

On earth, we are in a gravitational field of 1g, which according to the equivalence principle means we are effectively accelerating at 9.81m/s squared.

What does this mean? How can we be accelerating without increasing our velocity? Is there some way of looking at this, from some other inertial frame, that means we are travelling near light speed?

added 250 characters in body
Source Link
Amphibio
  • 1.1k
  • 6
  • 17

A thought experiment

If I was in a spaceship continually accelerating at 9.81m/s squared (1g) in a straight line, I would reach near light speed within a year.

On earth, we are continuallyin a gravitational field of 1g, which according to the equivalence principle means we are effectively accelerating at 9.81m/s squared. Are

What does this mean? How can we all effectivelybe accelerating without increasing our velocity? Is there some way of looking at this, from some other inertial frame, that means we are travelling nearat light speed?

A thought experiment

If I was in a spaceship continually accelerating at 9.81m/s (1g) I would reach near light speed within a year.

On earth, we are continually accelerating at 9.81m/s. Are we all effectively travelling near light speed?

If I was in a spaceship continually accelerating at 9.81m/s squared (1g) in a straight line, I would reach near light speed within a year.

On earth, we are in a gravitational field of 1g, which according to the equivalence principle means we are effectively accelerating at 9.81m/s squared.

What does this mean? How can we be accelerating without increasing our velocity? Is there some way of looking at this, from some other inertial frame, that means we are travelling at light speed?

Post Closed as "Needs details or clarity" by Norbert Schuch, user36790, Ryan Unger, ProfRob, Kyle Kanos
Source Link
Amphibio
  • 1.1k
  • 6
  • 17
Loading