Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 1, 2016 at 17:01 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Aug 18, 2016 at 15:42 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Jul 18, 2016 at 13:44 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Jun 8, 2016 at 10:15 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
May 8, 2016 at 10:07 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Dec 24, 2015 at 16:34 answer added ACuriousMind timeline score: 2
Dec 24, 2015 at 16:20 answer added Prahar timeline score: 0
Dec 24, 2015 at 15:13 comment added newt Well, I think, both))
Dec 24, 2015 at 14:44 history edited Qmechanic CC BY-SA 3.0
added 23 characters in body; edited tags
Dec 24, 2015 at 14:12 comment added ACuriousMind I'm not exactly sure what the question here is. By definition of quantization, a central charge appears when we quantize the Witt algebra, cf. this Q&A of mine, and then the central charge has to appear in the expansion of $T(z) = L_n z^{-n-2}$ since it is in the commutation relation of $L_n$ of equal level, and the $-2$ already shows this charge will thus play its role at $(z-w)^{-4}$. Are you asking why the central charge appears, or why the e-m tensor is $\sum_n L_n z^{-n-2}$?
Dec 24, 2015 at 13:27 history asked newt CC BY-SA 3.0