Timeline for Central charge in energy-momentum tensor OPE
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 1, 2016 at 17:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Aug 18, 2016 at 15:42 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jul 18, 2016 at 13:44 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jun 8, 2016 at 10:15 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
May 8, 2016 at 10:07 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Dec 24, 2015 at 16:34 | answer | added | ACuriousMind♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
Dec 24, 2015 at 16:20 | answer | added | Prahar | timeline score: 0 | |
Dec 24, 2015 at 15:13 | comment | added | newt | Well, I think, both)) | |
Dec 24, 2015 at 14:44 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 23 characters in body; edited tags
|
Dec 24, 2015 at 14:12 | comment | added | ACuriousMind♦ | I'm not exactly sure what the question here is. By definition of quantization, a central charge appears when we quantize the Witt algebra, cf. this Q&A of mine, and then the central charge has to appear in the expansion of $T(z) = L_n z^{-n-2}$ since it is in the commutation relation of $L_n$ of equal level, and the $-2$ already shows this charge will thus play its role at $(z-w)^{-4}$. Are you asking why the central charge appears, or why the e-m tensor is $\sum_n L_n z^{-n-2}$? | |
Dec 24, 2015 at 13:27 | history | asked | newt | CC BY-SA 3.0 |