Timeline for Magnetic vector potential of an infinite wire
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2023 at 9:37 | answer | added | Hosein Javanmardi | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 2, 2022 at 15:04 | comment | added | Chris Yang | The integral formula is a solution to Poisson's equation in three dimensions given the boundary condition that the potential vanishes at infinity; as such it cannot be applied in such a case where the current distribution is infinite. The corresponding formula for $V$ in electrostatics has the same restriction. | |
| S Dec 22, 2021 at 6:28 | vote | accept | Weezy | ||
| Dec 18, 2021 at 22:50 | answer | added | jensen paull | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 8, 2021 at 14:46 | comment | added | thedude | The integral formula cannot be used when the current extends all the way to infinity. This is also the case in electrostatics: if you try to compute the electric potential of an infinite wire using the integral representation you get a divergent integral as well. | |
| Dec 30, 2019 at 20:06 | vote | accept | Weezy | ||
| S Dec 22, 2021 at 6:28 | |||||
| Jun 5, 2018 at 11:44 | answer | added | Qais Karimzada | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 15, 2016 at 20:33 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Mar 15, 2016 at 20:15 | answer | added | Quantum spaghettification | timeline score: 8 | |
| Dec 5, 2015 at 9:42 | history | asked | Weezy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |