Skip to main content
5 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 9, 2012 at 16:07 history edited Arnold Neumaier CC BY-SA 3.0
emphasized the big picture
Mar 9, 2012 at 15:22 comment added Peter Morgan I'm good with that qualification.
Mar 9, 2012 at 15:07 comment added Arnold Neumaier Note that this is just the big picture, leaving out all details, which would make drawing borders difficult. For example, 1+0-dimensional QFT is equivalent to QM, in the same way as classically, and QFT can be done via Hamiltonians (similarity renormalization!) - but if you look at the most common stuff, it fits my big picture. If you want to discuss this more, we'd go to a chat room.
Mar 9, 2012 at 14:37 comment added Peter Morgan Do you really mean to say, or is it accidentally implied, that the distinction between QM and QFT can be characterized as respectively between quantizations of Hamiltonian and Lagrangian classical mechanics? It's a characterization that I find very doubtful in any case, but all the more so at the level of the question.
Mar 9, 2012 at 9:09 history answered Arnold Neumaier CC BY-SA 3.0