Skip to main content
35 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 13, 2023 at 10:56 comment added William Martens @AlfredCentauri Oh, no worries! I just left it a few days ago, i didn't want to offend, have a great continuing(coronafree) day! :) Wishes from Sweden! really ^^
Jan 12, 2023 at 23:38 comment added Alfred Centauri Hi @WilliamMartens, it's been a long time since I left that comment and cast that vote. I will take another look at it based on your recommendation.
Jan 8, 2023 at 20:16 comment added William Martens @AlfredCentauri I do not think we should close this question since it's a great question and answers too;
Aug 23, 2022 at 9:29 answer added YuJuchong123 timeline score: -1
Dec 2, 2020 at 3:08 comment added Edouard It's because of one of many ambiguities in the English language: Some forms of energy (often mediated by matter) that exert force are referred to AS forces, and others are not, except figuratively. (You might say, about someone who's unusually spontaneous and energetic, that "they're a force of nature", but you'll realize that you're alluding to their behavior, rather than their actual nature.) Physically, gravity is the shape of space, as far as we've been able to describe it consistently on the spatial scales to which we have some sensory access.
Jul 11, 2018 at 13:13 review Close votes
Jul 15, 2018 at 8:06
Sep 7, 2016 at 15:21 review Suggested edits
Sep 7, 2016 at 15:30
Dec 15, 2015 at 3:13 answer added Mozibur Ullah timeline score: 1
Dec 3, 2015 at 5:15 history tweeted twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/672282868220108800
Nov 25, 2015 at 15:12 answer added Shing timeline score: 5
Nov 24, 2015 at 23:52 answer added asperanz timeline score: 7
Nov 24, 2015 at 14:10 answer added John Duffield timeline score: -7
Nov 24, 2015 at 3:01 review Close votes
Nov 27, 2015 at 16:02
Nov 23, 2015 at 8:42 comment added Ooker Related: Why Feynman's integral is not taught today more widely and earlier in the academic physics curriculum?
Nov 21, 2015 at 5:36 answer added dhudsmith timeline score: 12
Nov 20, 2015 at 11:16 comment added Mindwin Remember Monica @AlfredCentauri Some silly is good. And there is a conceptual physics under the hood of this question. I side with Qmechanic that this is a duplicate of the linked question, but still in the scope of the site IMO. The fact that the community has not vote-closed the question also corroborates this. It is not black & white or grayscale, it is 2^32 color depth.
Nov 20, 2015 at 4:38 answer added goblin GONE timeline score: 32
Nov 20, 2015 at 2:39 comment added Alfred Centauri @Mindwin, since this question is objectively not a conceptual physics question, your judgement that it falls a "tiny bit" outside is just plain silly. As I wrote, it's a good question (and interesting too) but, again, the question of "Why is X taught this way" is objectively not a conceptual physics question.
Nov 20, 2015 at 2:37 comment added Alfred Centauri @dotancohen, regardless of your enthusiasm for this question, the question of "why is X taught this way" is clearly, objectively, not a conceptual physics question and thus, outside of the scope of this site. You may choose to disagree but you can't change that simple fact.
Nov 19, 2015 at 23:01 comment added Level River St The idea that "centrifugal force" is a force is even less correct, yet it's still a useful model in many situations.
Nov 19, 2015 at 16:25 answer added Martin Argerami timeline score: 37
Nov 19, 2015 at 14:59 answer added Vinay5forPrime timeline score: 9
Nov 19, 2015 at 14:54 comment added phresnel It's a model. Possibly/Probably/Definitely/Dunno, Einsteinian physics and Quantum Physics are just models, too.
Nov 19, 2015 at 14:53 comment added dotancohen I find that dupes are like symlinks. I often get to the good stuff by googling the dupes!
Nov 19, 2015 at 13:48 comment added Mindwin Remember Monica I second what @dotancohen said. You can't expect to draw a polygon and then any question that falls outside for a tiny bit is "vote close" material. Sometimes one will fall on the line, and then the value added to the site needs to be appraised. Don't Sheldon up. I think this could be marked as duplicate as Qmechanic stated, though. (duplicate does not decrease site value. It is just a way to link questions).
Nov 19, 2015 at 13:10 comment added dotancohen Though I agree that this is a physics education question, not a physics question, it implies a greater "Why is physics traditionally taught this way" question that is pertinent to both physicists and those learning physics. So pertinent, and in fact fundamental, that I consider this to be one of the best questions to be asked on this site.
Nov 19, 2015 at 9:47 history protected Qmechanic
Nov 19, 2015 at 9:29 answer added Tim B timeline score: 19
Nov 19, 2015 at 8:20 comment added Luaan This isn't really about physics, but rather about approaches to education. Most of education builds on simplifications and little lies - they are usually good enough for the understanding you require throughout middle school (and life, most of the time). The real stuff rarely comes before college.
Nov 19, 2015 at 7:20 history edited Qmechanic CC BY-SA 3.0
edited tags
Nov 19, 2015 at 7:19 comment added Qmechanic Possible duplicates: physics.stackexchange.com/q/61899/2451 and links therein.
Nov 19, 2015 at 2:06 review Close votes
Nov 19, 2015 at 7:09
Nov 19, 2015 at 1:50 comment added Alfred Centauri While a good question, it isn't a conceptual physics question and any answer given will can only be an opinion. Voting to close.
Nov 19, 2015 at 1:44 answer added ACuriousMind timeline score: 140
Nov 19, 2015 at 1:40 history asked Peter Hall CC BY-SA 3.0