Timeline for Can a spheromak propagate in vacuum?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 30, 2017 at 11:45 | vote | accept | Steven Mathey | ||
Oct 29, 2017 at 1:36 | answer | added | hmode | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 5, 2016 at 13:50 | history | edited | Steven Mathey |
added tag
|
|
Nov 26, 2015 at 10:10 | history | edited | Steven Mathey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I remonved one sentence in the second paragraph.
|
Nov 23, 2015 at 16:07 | history | edited | Steven Mathey |
Added tags
|
|
Nov 19, 2015 at 13:54 | comment | added | honeste_vivere | No, it appears that spheromaks may be a real phenomena. If so, they are distinctly different, I think. I was only commenting that we do observe distributions of particles in a slightly similar geometry. | |
Nov 19, 2015 at 13:36 | comment | added | Steven Mathey | @honeste_vivere So am I using the wrong terminology? Should I edit my question to replace 'spheromak' by 'ring-beam velocity distribution'? | |
Nov 19, 2015 at 13:04 | comment | added | honeste_vivere | So, you would not be able to do this by introducing such a configuration into a pure vacuum. The particle would quickly spread out diffusively. In a real plasma, like in space, we observe things kind of like these spheromak thingys, but not the same at all. What we observe are called ring-beam velocity distributions. Think of a doughnut-shaped clump of charged particles drifting along the background magnetic field (i.e., the center of the ring moves parallel to $\mathbf{B}$). | |
Nov 18, 2015 at 20:27 | history | asked | Steven Mathey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |