Skip to main content

Timeline for The size of extra dimensions

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 11, 2015 at 16:51 comment added IamZack The size will always depend on the constraints your model will face. A simple example: If you try to solve the Schrödinger equation for a infinite square well in 1+1 dimensions, you'll see that the radius of the extra dimension is constrained by the energy eingenvalues.
Nov 11, 2015 at 16:35 answer added Neuneck timeline score: 1
Nov 11, 2015 at 16:12 answer added anna v timeline score: 2
Nov 11, 2015 at 15:33 history edited Qmechanic CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 77 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Nov 11, 2015 at 15:28 answer added John Rennie timeline score: 0
Nov 11, 2015 at 15:22 comment added Qmechanic From a string-theoretic perspective, the number and shape of extra dimensions are addressed in e.g. physics.stackexchange.com/q/10126/2451 , physics.stackexchange.com/q/31882/2451 , physics.stackexchange.com/q/10527/2451 , physics.stackexchange.com/q/4972/2451 and links therein.
Nov 11, 2015 at 14:40 comment added Jiminion They basically are just adding dimensions to make their math work. As ACM says, if they are large, we'd see them by now. But since they are small, they are just there to make theories and formulae work.
Nov 11, 2015 at 14:37 comment added Les Adieux @ACuriousMind Not only for String theory. I was talking in general with an example. Supposing we have a theory which requires N dimensions. How could we determine the magnitude of these dimensions? Will they be small like 10^-50 m or will they be large like 10^50 m? Moreover I don't think we could see large dimensions. Think about a virus: it doesn't perceive the bigness o the world, it doesn't "see" our three space dimensions, even if for him are really really large...
Nov 11, 2015 at 14:33 comment added ACuriousMind The shape of the extra dimensions is not exactly predicted by string theory, but if they were large, we'd have seen them by now. I also don't know what you mean by our perceived dimensions having a "magnitude of centimeters, meters or whatever?".
Nov 11, 2015 at 14:31 history asked Les Adieux CC BY-SA 3.0