Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 7, 2015 at 17:46 history edited Qmechanic CC BY-SA 3.0
edited tags
Nov 7, 2015 at 17:41 vote accept Anton
Nov 7, 2015 at 17:32 comment added Gert In $F_g = am =\frac{-GMm}{d^2}$, $d$ is the distance between the particle and the centre of the Earth, not 'the distance from the floor'.
Nov 7, 2015 at 17:31 answer added CR Drost timeline score: 2
Nov 7, 2015 at 17:27 comment added Anton Interesting, I think the leapfrog method is what I'm looking for, but could you tell me where I went wrong when I tried to do this on my own?
Nov 7, 2015 at 17:17 comment added Kyle Kanos Though if you're trying to model this, I'd suggest that you're going about it the wrong way. You are more likely going to want to use the leapfrog method (or something similar).
Nov 7, 2015 at 17:15 comment added Anton @KyleKanos Yes I can. You're right. But, that still leaves me with $2.59$ and $9.44$.
Nov 7, 2015 at 17:14 comment added Kyle Kanos If your lower bound is the floor at $d=0$, you can drop the negative root, no?
Nov 7, 2015 at 17:13 comment added Anton I'm not bouncing from a great or small height. The particle (magically) gets upward velocity when it's on the ground
Nov 7, 2015 at 17:12 history edited Anton CC BY-SA 3.0
added 97 characters in body
Nov 7, 2015 at 16:59 comment added Gert You can't just drop $G$ (or the minus sign!) because you 'have no use for it'! Also, $a=\frac{d^2 r}{dt^2}$. Your equations make very little sense and you freely mix up $d$ and $r$. You also might want to decide whether you're bouncing from a great height or a small one: the latter case is easier to derive.
Nov 7, 2015 at 16:53 history edited Gert
edited tags
Nov 7, 2015 at 16:39 review First posts
Nov 7, 2015 at 17:58
Nov 7, 2015 at 16:35 history asked Anton CC BY-SA 3.0