Timeline for Wick rotation and spinors
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 22, 2017 at 15:48 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 12 characters in body; edited tags
|
Aug 22, 2017 at 15:37 | answer | added | Henry Deith | timeline score: 2 | |
Aug 22, 2017 at 15:30 | comment | added | Henry Deith | Why do you say that there is no finite dimensional spinor representation of SO(4)? What about, for example this discussion? | |
Jan 6, 2017 at 1:35 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Dec 4, 2016 at 19:13 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Nov 1, 2016 at 6:10 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Sep 27, 2016 at 14:43 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Nov 9, 2014 at 15:38 | answer | added | Peter | timeline score: -1 | |
Feb 21, 2012 at 17:06 | comment | added | Misha | Could you specify more precisely where is the problem? Probably, illustrate it with some functional integral. | |
Feb 21, 2012 at 16:48 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | You may find these papers interesting: arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9608174 , arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9611043 | |
Feb 21, 2012 at 14:48 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/171969586437165056 | ||
Feb 21, 2012 at 12:31 | history | asked | toot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |