Skip to main content
added 263 characters in body
Source Link
DarthPlagueis
  • 1.6k
  • 12
  • 31

This is a question relating to Wien's displacement law for the Planck function. As we all know frequency and wavelength are related to the speed of light by:

$$\nu\lambda=c$$

However, why is it that:

$$\nu_{\mathrm{peak}}\lambda_{\mathrm{peak}}\neq{c}$$

Any explanations would be very much appreciated.

To all of the people wanting to know where this statement came from. It hasn't come from anywhere specific, is it a well known fact of the Planck function. $\lambda_{\mathrm{peak}}=0.290T^{-1}$ cm K and $\nu_{\mathrm{peak}}=5.88\times{10^{10}}T$ Hz K$^{-1}$.

This is a question relating to Wien's displacement law for the Planck function. As we all know frequency and wavelength are related to the speed of light by:

$$\nu\lambda=c$$

However, why is it that:

$$\nu_{\mathrm{peak}}\lambda_{\mathrm{peak}}\neq{c}$$

Any explanations would be very much appreciated.

This is a question relating to Wien's displacement law for the Planck function. As we all know frequency and wavelength are related to the speed of light by:

$$\nu\lambda=c$$

However, why is it that:

$$\nu_{\mathrm{peak}}\lambda_{\mathrm{peak}}\neq{c}$$

Any explanations would be very much appreciated.

To all of the people wanting to know where this statement came from. It hasn't come from anywhere specific, is it a well known fact of the Planck function. $\lambda_{\mathrm{peak}}=0.290T^{-1}$ cm K and $\nu_{\mathrm{peak}}=5.88\times{10^{10}}T$ Hz K$^{-1}$.

Source Link
DarthPlagueis
  • 1.6k
  • 12
  • 31

Frequency and Wavelength peak for Wien's displaement law of a blackbody

This is a question relating to Wien's displacement law for the Planck function. As we all know frequency and wavelength are related to the speed of light by:

$$\nu\lambda=c$$

However, why is it that:

$$\nu_{\mathrm{peak}}\lambda_{\mathrm{peak}}\neq{c}$$

Any explanations would be very much appreciated.