Timeline for Why is the charge of a proton positive? [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 6, 2015 at 18:32 | history | closed |
John Rennie Kyle Kanos ACuriousMind♦ Qmechanic♦ |
Duplicate of Why is the charge naming convention wrong?, Who (and Why) started the "electrons are negative, protons are positive" convention? [duplicate] | |
Oct 6, 2015 at 18:32 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
Oct 6, 2015 at 14:11 | review | Close votes | |||
Oct 6, 2015 at 18:32 | |||||
Oct 6, 2015 at 13:55 | comment | added | John Rennie | Possible duplicate of Who (and Why) started the "electrons are negative, protons are positive" convention? | |
Oct 6, 2015 at 13:28 | comment | added | Jonas Greitemann | As a word of warning: while everybody agrees that the charge of the electron is negative, there is no agreement over whether the electron has charge $e$ (with $e<0$) or charge $-e$ with $e>0$. | |
Oct 6, 2015 at 13:25 | comment | added | Omar Nagib | Positive and negative are just conventions. What is not a convention however is that electrons and protons have charges of opposite sign so that $q_{\text{electron}} q_{\text{proton}}<0$. | |
Oct 6, 2015 at 13:24 | answer | added | Slereah | timeline score: 3 | |
Oct 6, 2015 at 13:23 | answer | added | Matt | timeline score: -2 | |
Oct 6, 2015 at 13:21 | review | First posts | |||
Oct 6, 2015 at 13:26 | |||||
Oct 6, 2015 at 13:20 | history | asked | Eric Johnson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |