Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 23, 2019 at 21:30 history edited peterh CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Sep 26, 2015 at 1:19 comment added Eric Yang Thanks a lot. And in one of links, I find that the notes of David Tong are very clear on this topic.
Sep 25, 2015 at 13:58 comment added Qmechanic 1. More on reduction from QFT to QM: physics.stackexchange.com/q/26960/2451 , physics.stackexchange.com/q/4156/2451 and links therein. 2. For a connection between Schr. eq. and Klein-Gordon eq, see e.g. A. Zee, QFT in a Nutshell, Chap. III.5, and this Phys.SE post plus links therein.
Sep 25, 2015 at 13:57 history edited Qmechanic
edited tags
Sep 25, 2015 at 9:48 vote accept Eric Yang
Sep 25, 2015 at 4:28 comment added Mark Rosenblitt-Janssen I suggest you look at my answer on <physics.stackexchange.com/q/19775>.
Sep 25, 2015 at 4:20 answer added Javier timeline score: 10
Sep 25, 2015 at 3:39 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/647254111973412864
Sep 25, 2015 at 1:44 answer added Cosmas Zachos timeline score: 5
Sep 23, 2015 at 23:44 comment added Eric Yang In the view of path integral, quantum mechanics may be just 0+1 dimensional QFT. But here I mainly focus on canonical quantization, and I want to derive Schrodinger equation of particle's wave function if we assume the velocity of particles is low and neglect the creation and annihilation of particles.
Sep 23, 2015 at 14:17 comment added ACuriousMind Just to be sure: QM is just 0+1 dimensional QFT, but you're asking if QM can be recovered generally as a low energy limit of the 3+1 QFT, right?
Sep 23, 2015 at 14:06 history asked Eric Yang CC BY-SA 3.0