Timeline for Does not the mass of those living on the Earth add on to the mass of the Earth or is it too negligible to be cared for?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2015 at 6:00 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | Hi Amit Joki. If you haven't already done so, please take a minute to read the definition of when to use the homework-and-exercises tag, and the Phys.SE policy for homework-like problems. | |
| Sep 20, 2015 at 2:38 | comment | added | Amit Joki | @Qmechanic that was a good read. And come on, if such questions were given as homeworks, Indian Education system would reach a new high, alas! it's not the case. This question just cropped up in my mind out of curiosity. My age might have lead you to that assumption. I thought the weight was only of Earth's surface and it's core, anyway the answers cleared up my trivial doubts. Thanks. | |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 17:35 | comment | added | Shubham | the things on earth "the trees, buildings, people, animals, water etc..." are made from the particles present on Earth itself, if u don't count those little asteroids hitting sometimes...... | |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 17:08 | comment | added | Solomon Slow | Add? We didn't all beam down from the Enterprise. | |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 15:37 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | If you like this question you may also enjoy reading this Phys.SE post. | |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 15:35 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Sep 19, 2015 at 10:17 | answer | added | Chris Cundy | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 10:08 | answer | added | Steeven | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 10:08 | answer | added | Hagadol | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 10:08 | comment | added | userLTK | The mass of the Earth is calculated by measuring how fast objects orbit it, so that mass includes, trees, plants, even bugs. That's the easiest way to measure the Earth's mass. An estimate of the mass of all trees, for example, is quite a bit more difficult and I'd wager, a good deal less accurate. | |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 10:04 | answer | added | boyfarrell | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 9:55 | history | asked | Amit Joki | CC BY-SA 3.0 |