Timeline for Bohr's atomic model
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2015 at 20:46 | comment | added | dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten | Tahammul, no you haven't said why. Neither did Bohr. He simple said if we assume they have to obey this discrete energy loss relationship (for some unexplained reason) then we get a model with some features that agree with certain other observations. The "Why?" question can be answered with reference to a more complete quantum mechanical theory, but you have to abandon much of the thinking that goes into the Bohr model in the first place (no great loss there: the Bohr model gets most things wrong anyway). | |
| Sep 6, 2015 at 10:08 | comment | added | Tajammul Saleem | I guess i have given a pretty precise answer and if the op needs further clarification i am in for that too. You wont be the one deciding whether i am right or wrong and secondly i will be reading the guidelines of the forum and will follow them. | |
| Sep 6, 2015 at 9:56 | comment | added | Hritik Narayan | This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post - you can always comment on your own posts, and once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post. | |
| Sep 6, 2015 at 9:44 | review | Low quality answers | |||
| Sep 6, 2015 at 13:13 | |||||
| Sep 6, 2015 at 8:09 | history | answered | Tajammul Saleem | CC BY-SA 3.0 |