Timeline for Is string theory really science?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2020 at 5:39 | history | edited | anna v | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
correction TeV
|
| Sep 19, 2015 at 5:29 | history | edited | anna v | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
clarification
|
| Sep 19, 2015 at 3:49 | history | edited | anna v | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
expanding on answer
|
| Sep 5, 2015 at 15:30 | comment | added | Omry | @physics101 SUSY particles were first theorized below 1TeV, but were not found there. (Actually lower, but let's not get into that). We keep trying to find evidence of them, but we do not know when the breakthrough will come. (If it ever does) Also, note that SUSY, while a requirement for (Most? All? I'm not sure) String Theory models, if proven, will not be a validation of those, just a step in the right direction. | |
| Sep 5, 2015 at 14:56 | comment | added | physics101 | Supersymmetric particles are possible at present energies of LHC? | |
| Sep 5, 2015 at 14:51 | comment | added | anna v | no, it is not a necessary condition. I added a link as an example | |
| Sep 5, 2015 at 14:50 | history | edited | anna v | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 75 characters in body
|
| Sep 5, 2015 at 14:49 | comment | added | Horus | So does it need 19 TeV or 19 GeV? | |
| Sep 5, 2015 at 14:47 | history | answered | anna v | CC BY-SA 3.0 |