Timeline for Peskin eqn 7.2 contradiction
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Sep 7, 2015 at 3:11 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
S Sep 7, 2015 at 3:11 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
Sep 5, 2015 at 19:58 | comment | added | Hydro Guy | That was the kind of thing that made me abandon Perskin for good | |
Sep 5, 2015 at 10:43 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 52 characters in body
|
Sep 5, 2015 at 10:39 | vote | accept | Okazaki | ||
Sep 5, 2015 at 7:50 | answer | added | TwoBs | timeline score: 1 | |
Aug 31, 2015 at 20:02 | answer | added | TLDR | timeline score: 18 | |
Aug 30, 2015 at 2:21 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/637812318223605760 | ||
S Aug 30, 2015 at 1:41 | history | bounty started | JeffDror | ||
S Aug 30, 2015 at 1:41 | history | notice added | JeffDror | Draw attention | |
Aug 23, 2015 at 8:25 | comment | added | Okazaki | @ACuriousMind Yes that's the most obvious explanation but why is that justified? Why can we just set it to zero? | |
Aug 22, 2015 at 23:25 | comment | added | ACuriousMind♦ | Have they perhaps forgotten to tell you they set $E_0 = 0$? | |
S Aug 22, 2015 at 23:23 | history | edited | Timaeus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 55 characters in body
|
Aug 22, 2015 at 23:18 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Aug 22, 2015 at 23:23 | |||||
Aug 22, 2015 at 22:56 | history | asked | Okazaki | CC BY-SA 3.0 |