Timeline for Why do chiral objects only come in pairs?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2013 at 7:09 | history | edited | Manishearth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 99 characters in body; edited title
|
| Mar 4, 2012 at 13:57 | answer | added | Manishearth | timeline score: 17 | |
| Jan 25, 2012 at 9:32 | comment | added | user6090 | No answers? Is my question still unclear? | |
| Jan 12, 2012 at 7:21 | comment | added | user6090 | Yes, my questions regards the reason many things in physics come in pair, (why 2 and not 3, 4 ...?). This question regards chirality but the bottom line is the number "2" and how is it related to our physical world. | |
| Jan 11, 2012 at 18:41 | comment | added | John | @Qmechanic: I don't think so. I think he's asking about if the definition of Chirlaity only invloves two mirror images or more than one. | |
| Jan 11, 2012 at 15:15 | comment | added | Ron Maimon | Like what? Examples will help here. | |
| Jan 11, 2012 at 7:50 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | Possibly related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/18280/2451 | |
| Jan 11, 2012 at 7:32 | history | asked | user6090 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |