Timeline for Why is the free field operator the same with interactions present?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2016 at 17:01 | comment | added | yuggib | @Hamurabi However if you're looking for literature on a more specific subject I may (not sure) be able to help | |
| Jan 25, 2016 at 17:00 | comment | added | yuggib | @Hamurabi I'm not sure I understand exactly your request...as far as I know the only QFT results that are completely representation free are those of algebraic quantum field theory (AQFT). The reference and founding paper on this approach is of Haag and Kastler. However I don't think that it is possible to find dynamical results within AQFT. Usually to have non-perturbative dynamical results you either need to use a path integral formulation (however it is often mathematically ill-defined), or manipulations that start from the Fock representation. | |
| Jan 25, 2016 at 16:31 | comment | added | Hamurabi | Good comment! Can you recommend any literature dealing with moving into a representation free phase of the theory (td. limit)? | |
| Jul 13, 2015 at 8:45 | history | edited | yuggib | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Jul 12, 2015 at 14:13 | history | answered | yuggib | CC BY-SA 3.0 |