Timeline for Difference between anti-matter and matter black holes

5 events

when toggle format	what		by	license	comment
Jun 11, 2015 at 17:16	history	edited	Timaeus	CC BY-SA 3.0	added 696 characters in body
Jun 11, 2015 at 17:14	comment	added	Timaeus		If you were that close spatially and temporarily you were basically already interacting with the star as it fell through, sorta like you started an interaction with it that just hadn't finished yet as it crossed, its kinda cheating. And as you said you'd already be able to figure that out by looking at the highest speed things in emitted as it fell through. Also since there is some asymmetry between matter and antimatter you might even be able to analyze the light it emitted as it fell though. But that will be red shifted tremendously, so it's a bit like frozen star or red star analysis.
Jun 11, 2015 at 16:53	comment	added	dualredlaugh		But as far as measurements taken by outside observers, it sounds like from what I've read, that the only measurements which could distinguish collapsing matter vs antimatter stars would be detection of neutrinos vs antineutrinos before disappearance across event horizon. Not long after fter the star crosses the event horizon, differences in the polarization of the quantum vacuum are potentially detectable then? I wonder if these measurements would need to be made close to the event horizon.
Jun 11, 2015 at 16:42	comment	added	dualredlaugh		Very interesting. Never thought about the actual process of collapse within the event horizon.
Jun 10, 2015 at 21:11	history	answered	Timaeus	CC BY-SA 3.0