Skip to main content
Post Closed as "Duplicate" by user10851, Kyle Kanos, John Rennie, ACuriousMind, Ryan Unger
added 1 character in body; edited tags
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k

Schaum's Quantum Mechanics comes up with

exp((-i/$\hbar$)$\cdot \theta \cdot{\hat{L}} \cdot {\overrightarrow{n}}$)$$\exp((-i/\hbar)\cdot \theta \cdot{\hat{L}} \cdot {\overrightarrow{n}})$$

as the formula of the rotation operator. Other sources I see don't have the negative sign. How did they get the negative sign in here?

Schaum's Quantum Mechanics comes up with

exp((-i/$\hbar$)$\cdot \theta \cdot{\hat{L}} \cdot {\overrightarrow{n}}$)

as the formula of the rotation operator. Other sources I see don't have the negative sign. How did they get the negative sign in here?

Schaum's Quantum Mechanics comes up with

$$\exp((-i/\hbar)\cdot \theta \cdot{\hat{L}} \cdot {\overrightarrow{n}})$$

as the formula of the rotation operator. Other sources I see don't have the negative sign. How did they get the negative sign in here?

Source Link
a00
  • 307
  • 1
  • 5
  • 13

Negative sign in rotation operator (quantum mechanics, angular momentum)

Schaum's Quantum Mechanics comes up with

exp((-i/$\hbar$)$\cdot \theta \cdot{\hat{L}} \cdot {\overrightarrow{n}}$)

as the formula of the rotation operator. Other sources I see don't have the negative sign. How did they get the negative sign in here?