Timeline for Binding energy per nucleon dependency
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 31, 2019 at 23:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jan 9, 2017 at 10:00 | history | edited | rob♦ |
edited tags
|
|
Jan 9, 2017 at 9:59 | answer | added | rob♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
May 25, 2015 at 8:58 | history | edited | ProfRob | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added word nuclear
|
May 25, 2015 at 8:48 | comment | added | QCD_IS_GOOD | Sorry, I meant the nuclear binding energy | |
May 25, 2015 at 8:47 | history | edited | QCD_IS_GOOD | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 8 characters in body
|
May 25, 2015 at 8:46 | comment | added | ProfRob | @JoshuaLin The nuclear binding energy of hydrogen is zero. The hydrogen atom in its ground state has a binding energy of 13.6 eV. It is bound because it has a binding energy. Can you be clearer in your question about what definition of binding energy you want to know about. | |
May 25, 2015 at 7:41 | comment | added | QCD_IS_GOOD | Why would hydrogen have a binding energy? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_atom Wikipedia says the binding energy of hydrogen is exactly 0? | |
May 25, 2015 at 7:39 | comment | added | John Duffield | Like what CuriousOne said, yes. Think of hydrogen. You've got one nucleon, a proton. You've also got an electron. The binding energy is -13.6keV. An incoming photon comes along, the electron jumps to a different orbital, and the binding energy has changed. | |
May 25, 2015 at 1:41 | comment | added | CuriousOne | Yes, but very weakly. There are tiny chemical modulations of nuclear energies, so in theory nuclear decays and reactions are susceptible to chemical composition, temperature, pressure etc.. but the effects are so small that they can be neglected for all purposes as far as I know. | |
May 25, 2015 at 0:43 | history | asked | QCD_IS_GOOD | CC BY-SA 3.0 |