Timeline for what is the result of change in gravitational flux?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2015 at 13:58 | vote | accept | Shubham | ||
| Apr 30, 2015 at 11:39 | answer | added | user42076 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 30, 2015 at 11:36 | answer | added | Selene Routley | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 30, 2015 at 11:04 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 30, 2015 at 22:34 | |||||
| Apr 30, 2015 at 10:55 | comment | added | Shubham | @ACuriousMind Thanks my doubt got cleared! Sorry for being unclear | |
| Apr 30, 2015 at 10:50 | comment | added | ACuriousMind♦ | 1. You did not answer the question whether this is Newtonian gravity or general relativity. 2. The Newtonian gravitational field is much more similar to the electric field than it is to the magnetic field, but there is no full equivalence between EM and gravity because the of the interdependence of the electric and magnetic fields. There is no "second field" such as the magnetic field for the gravitational field, and the formalism gives no reason to believe there is, so it's unclear what you're asking. | |
| Apr 30, 2015 at 10:47 | comment | added | Shubham | @ACuriousMind I have updated the question Please have a look | |
| Apr 30, 2015 at 10:45 | history | edited | Shubham | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 225 characters in body
|
| Apr 30, 2015 at 10:36 | comment | added | ACuriousMind♦ | Are you asking this for Newtonian gravity, or for general relativity? If the former, why should there be a "result", if the latter, define gravitaational flux. | |
| Apr 30, 2015 at 10:35 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 30, 2015 at 11:41 | |||||
| Apr 30, 2015 at 10:32 | history | asked | Shubham | CC BY-SA 3.0 |