Timeline for What are the implications of the speed of light broken? [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Nov 18, 2011 at 23:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
insert duplicate link
|
|
| Nov 18, 2011 at 23:43 | history | closed | David Z | exact duplicate | |
| Nov 18, 2011 at 21:27 | answer | added | MartinHaTh | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 18, 2011 at 20:31 | comment | added | Jonathan. | Today's news is just that one possible error in the experiment has mostly been proven not to be a factor in the time difference. There are other things that could be the reason for the results. Also the results will have to be verified completely independently for it to get to any where near close to 'yes, it is possible for something to go a faster than the speed of light'. It will be a few months at least before other teams release their resultson the subject | |
| Nov 18, 2011 at 20:14 | answer | added | lurscher | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 18, 2011 at 20:11 | comment | added | Georg | Einstein would think that Samuel Duclos is not a champion in search engine use. | |
| Nov 18, 2011 at 20:10 | comment | added | Alexander | I think your question is almost a duplicate of can neutrinos travel faster than light and if it turns out.... For now your statement "the speed of light has been broken" is still under heavy debate. Thousands of physicists are trying to figure out if it is really broken or not, so I guess you just have to wait and see. | |
| Nov 18, 2011 at 20:01 | history | asked | Samuel Duclos | CC BY-SA 3.0 |