Skip to main content
boundary tags does not apply
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k

So we know that for the really small world we have quantum mechanical behavior and for big things we have classical behavior.But But what is the boundary that differentiates the two? If we make a thought experiment with a maze getting smaller and smaller,when can we say that it goes from the classical world to the quantum mechanical and does it has to do only with the mass and size of an object?

So we know that for the really small world we have quantum mechanical behavior and for big things we have classical behavior.But what is the boundary that differentiates the two? If we make a thought experiment with a maze getting smaller and smaller,when can we say that it goes from the classical world to the quantum mechanical and does it has to do only with the mass and size of an object?

So we know that for the really small world we have quantum mechanical behavior and for big things we have classical behavior. But what is the boundary that differentiates the two? If we make a thought experiment with a maze getting smaller and smaller,when can we say that it goes from the classical world to the quantum mechanical and does it has to do only with the mass and size of an object?

Source Link
TheQuantumMan
  • 7.9k
  • 6
  • 36
  • 96

Boundary of classical and quantum world

So we know that for the really small world we have quantum mechanical behavior and for big things we have classical behavior.But what is the boundary that differentiates the two? If we make a thought experiment with a maze getting smaller and smaller,when can we say that it goes from the classical world to the quantum mechanical and does it has to do only with the mass and size of an object?