Timeline for Does "apparent frequency" mean the Doppler effect is not an actual physical effect?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2016 at 4:08 | answer | added | Rahul | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 13, 2015 at 10:14 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Mar 12, 2015 at 18:16 | answer | added | Paul | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 12, 2015 at 16:58 | answer | added | DWin | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 12, 2015 at 2:21 | answer | added | Floris | timeline score: 10 | |
| Mar 12, 2015 at 1:03 | answer | added | Asher | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 11, 2015 at 23:29 | history | edited | ACuriousMind♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 74 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Mar 11, 2015 at 23:25 | answer | added | user74893 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 11, 2015 at 12:45 | comment | added | Kyle Kanos | If the Doppler effect were physiological, then it likely wouldn't happen to all sounds for all people ;). But since it does, it follows that it is a physical phenomenon, no? | |
| Mar 11, 2015 at 10:21 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 11, 2015 at 12:45 | |||||
| Mar 11, 2015 at 10:19 | history | asked | user64189 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |