Skip to main content
Physics

Return to Question

added 74 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Source Link
ACuriousMind ♦
ACuriousMind ♦
  • 128.8k
  • 31
  • 293
  • 701

Does "apparent frequency" mean the Doppler effect and apparent frequencyis not an actual physical effect?

inWhen discussing Dopplerthe Doppler effect,we we use the word ''apparent frequency''"apparent frequency".does it Does that mean that the frequency of sound is still that of the source and that it is some physiological phenomenon in the listener's ear that gives rise to Doppler effect? what ifIs this different for the observer approaching the source and for the source approaching the observer?

Doppler effect and apparent frequency

in discussing Doppler effect,we use the word ''apparent frequency''.does it mean that the frequency of sound is still that of the source and it is some physiological phenomenon in the listener's ear that gives rise to Doppler effect? what if the observer approaching the source and for the source approaching the observer?

Does "apparent frequency" mean the Doppler effect is not an actual physical effect?

When discussing the Doppler effect, we use the word "apparent frequency". Does that mean that the frequency of sound is still that of the source and that it is some physiological phenomenon in the listener's ear that gives rise to Doppler effect? Is this different for the observer approaching the source and for the source approaching the observer?

Source Link
user64189
user64189

Doppler effect and apparent frequency

in discussing Doppler effect,we use the word ''apparent frequency''.does it mean that the frequency of sound is still that of the source and it is some physiological phenomenon in the listener's ear that gives rise to Doppler effect? what if the observer approaching the source and for the source approaching the observer?