Skip to main content

Timeline for Constant velocity in siphon?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 13, 2011 at 21:40 comment added Noldorin @Georg: Yep, you are right. With this extra assumption, it now all makes sense, as shown in the derivation in the accepted answer.
Nov 13, 2011 at 21:36 vote accept Noldorin
Nov 13, 2011 at 8:38 comment added Georg Because in that wiki incompressibility of the fluid is not mentioned, this conclusion is not really correct. Such a siphon could be used for a gas as well. The writer had better used the term liquid in place of fluid.
Nov 13, 2011 at 5:21 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/135588034874847232
Nov 13, 2011 at 4:29 answer added Alan Rominger timeline score: 4
Nov 13, 2011 at 3:34 history asked Noldorin CC BY-SA 3.0